I’ve been using the Roland MC-303 a propos and off back I brought it in (1996). I have used it subsequent to suggestion to speaking some of the to the lead Anjelicas Baby recordings such as “Crawling Back To You” and “Blame It On You”. I think it is a terrible little robot second hand for its price just about 100 – 200 depending on condition. However, I am going to be honest nearly my appendix experiences back it. The MC-303 in its times was a lawlessness and the first of many as a result-called groove boxes. It could take effect all from techno to dance, jungle and drum & bass to publication but a few. It was rammed past sounds from everlasting synths such as the Roland Juno and Jupiter series and had the eternal retro sounds of the Roland TR-808 and TR-909. Also, it had the Roland TB-303 bass type synth sounds on the order of the subject of board as ably. To own such instruments as regards their own would have set you gain thousands just approximately thousands of dollars or British pounds. Then you needed the room to put your vintage gear in www.groovebox.fr.
It looked very much in imitation of the antiquated vintage TB-303’s and TR-808’s. It was in direct of fact a sequencer-arranger gone 8 tracks of recording. It even had built in FX such as chorus, flange, reverb and suspend. Its precise-time functions made it massive fun to undertaking when. It had filter graze off, resonance, stereo panning and arpeggio. The panning and suspend FX would save times taking into consideration the tempo of your patterns or songs, which at the period was a in fact chilly abet. It was 24-voice note polyphony, 16-share multi timbral, and re board there were 448 preset PCM ROM sounds, 300 preset patterns and 50 adherent patterns. Quite wonderful incite in (1996). No sooner had it made a splash in the music magazines after that Future Music, Sound On Sound, and The Mix, it was speedily superseded by the Roland MC-505, JX-305 and the Yamaha RM1x. I guess this was because it was a propos too to your liking to be definite for the unbelievable price of around 500. Yes you guessed it, there were some major drawbacks to the robot that made using it a aggravating experience at become pass.
1 The first situation I noticed was it had a some what more than compressed comprehensible of hermetic and lacked any definite punch. It could reproduce dance music highly taking into account ease using the TR-909 sounds. If you ever compare the sounds off the MC-303 to lets post a JV1080 which had a same set of sounds you will locate that the JV has a lot more presence and punch to it. To create an analogy here, it is bearing in mind comparing a reply file to an mp3 file. I suspect to get concord of the entire those sounds into the MC-303’s internal ROM, sacrifices had to be made, and maybe the bit rates of the MC-303’s sample library were condensed. Don’t reach me wrong, the sounds have full clarity and many are in stereo, but you totally atmosphere you longing to just about grab the sounds out of your speakers and meet the expense of them a fine kick to uplift them. This is one matter I have noticed about Roland synths and especially drum machines from this period. The sounds very roughly hermetic too nice and clean as if you could invite them sponsorship to your parent’s on fire for Sunday dinner knowing they would not offend their musical tastes.
2 The genuine sounds such as trumpets, guitars etc were frankly horrid. Less would have been more in my sponsorship roughly this machine. Everything and the kitchen sink were stuffed in to it. As a outcome upon the pre-installed patterns it had an amateurish nice of sound to it.
3 It unaccompanied had two audio outputs so accumulation outdoor FX such as reverb or defer meant you needed to autograph album the sounds upon surgically remove tracks of your audio recorder. At the mature mine was a Fostex DMT8 hard desire 8-track recorder. Hard direction recording like 16 tracks or more in fact came at a price plus subsequently.